|
Black box warning labels DECREASE suicide
No Significant increase since HUGE REDUCTION in
SSRI Use!
Recently people have been reporting that SINCE
the anti-depressant medications have obtained a
Black Box Warning Label, indicating they can
CAUSE people to feel suicidal, there has been a
significant reduction in the use of these drugs,
there has been a 16-18% increase in suicides…due
to not taking the medications. THIS IS SIMPLY
FALSE AND MISLEADING.
While one obvious rebuttal for this
antidepressant/suicide story is that correlation
does not equal causation -- and researcher Dr.
David Antonuccio, PhD makes a good point about
neglecting the increase in anti-psychotics for
kids (i.e. as well as many other potential
variables) --there is an even MORE GLARING
REASON that Newsweek and other media should be
ashamed of itself for suggesting this idea.
Read Below.
Only wishful thinking on the part of
antidepressant manufacturers leads to a
conclusion that the drop in SSRI prescriptions
for 5-18 year old in 2004 has resulted in
increased suicide for that age group. The
researcher who told Newsweek that reduced
antidepressant prescribing has led to more
suicides in kids is on the advisory board of Eli
Lilly (manufacturers of Prozac). If
one examines suicide rates for the entire period
from 1999 to 2003, when antidepressant use for
this age group was high, one sees that 2004
suicide rates are unremarkable.
According to official CDC statistics, the rate
of suicide for CDC's 5-14 age group in 2004 is
exactly the same rate as in both 2001 and 2000.
Similarly, the suicide rate for CDC's 15-24 age
group in 2004 is actually slightly lower than
the 2000 rate. Should there actually ever be a
substantive increase in suicide rates, history
tells us the likely source will not be a lack of
psychiatric treatment but rather social or
economic upheavals.
Sources: If you and Newsweek would like
to check out the actual CDC suicide statistics,
I have the CDC links and tables that make it
clear that suicide rates have not increased
after decreased antidepressant prescriptions for
5-18 year-olds.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr54/nvsr54_13.pdf
CDC's National Vital Statistics Report Deaths:
Final Data 2003 (which includes data from
1999-2003)
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr54/nvsr54_19.pdf
CDC's National Vital Statistics Report: Deaths
Preliminary Data 2004
Deaths per 100,000
Intentional self-harm
(suicide) 5-14 years
2004 0.7
2003 0.6
2002 0.6
2001 0.7
2000 0.7
1999 0.6
Intentional self-harm
(suicide) 15-24 years
2004 10.1
2003 9.7
2002 9.9
2001 9.9
2000 10.2
1999 10.1
Intentional self-harm
(suicide) All Ages
2004 10.8
2003 10.8
2002 11.0
2001 10.8
2000 10.4
1999 10.5
"Pharmacoepidemiological studies
examining the relationship between trends in
sales or prescription fills of SSRIs have
consistently shown a relationship between
increases in SSRI prescription rates and
declines in adolescent suicide rates (9, 35–37).
On the basis of those studies, one might expect
that the adolescent suicide rate would begin
increasing in the wake of the FDA advisory after
a decade of steady decline. {p. 890}"
The Newsweek article stated that
prescriptions for pediatric depression (ages 5 -
18) dropped more than 50% between 2003 and 2005
-- a 2-year period. This is also not what the
article in Am J. Psychiatry stated. It
stated that prescription rates for pediatric
depression had been steadily rising since 1998,
and that after the October 2003 black box
warning prescription rates in October 2005
were 58% lower than they would have been had
they continued to rise between October 2003 and
October 2005 at the same average rate at
which they had risen between October 1998 and
October 2003. Using their figures, the
actual decline in prescription rates for SSRIs
for pediatric depression between October 2003
and October 2005 was 45.5%.
Then the article states that "in a parallel
development, the number of teen suicides jumped
a record 18% between 2003 and 2004." It
mentioned no source. It did mention that the CDC
will release suicide figures for 2005 in
December of this year. This leads me to believe
that the Newsweek article used CDC above.
If they used the CDC data for the ages 5 -
14, using only one significant figure (we could
use more than one) the increase between 2003 and
2004 is 0.7 / 0.6 = 16.67%.
In the 15 - 24
"teenager" age group the increase between 2003
and 2004 is
10.1 / 9.7 = 4.1%.
I would expect to find more
teenagers in this group than in the former, and
would certainly expect a higher suicide rate in
the latter group.When
the two age groups are aggregated into one (5 -
24), there was no change, the rate remained 10.8
per 100000.
In this case a reversal from increases in
suicide rates over time to no significant rate
change over time. It isn't really a paradox. It
is just the result of combining groups of
different sizes and comparing aggregates with
the separate groups. It looks as someone picked
the group that best fit what they wanted and
ignored the aggregate data. When discussing teen
suicides I think that the 5 - 14 group is the
least significant of the three.
Now this "18 % increase in teen suicides from
2003 to 2004" is being broadcasted all over the
place as if it is an actual fact.
Tony Dokoupil’s Trouble in a ‘Black Box’ (July
16 article) importantly addresses the risks and
benefits of prescribing antidepressants to
children. However, the referenced study is far
from “compelling” evidence for removing the FDA
Black Box warning and such an interpretation of
its findings is misleading.
An inspection of this Eli
Lily funded study reveals that the precipitous
drop in SSRI prescriptions did not occur, as
reported, from 2003 to 2005 but rather from
February to October of 2005 (over 85% of the
drop in the last 6 months of the reported time).
The so-called “parallel development” of
increased suicides occurred between 2003 and
2004—and therefore had no relationship to the
drop in prescription rates reported in this
study. Given that the decrease in
prescription rates and increase in suicides
occurred in different time periods, it begs the
question of how such unsubstantiated statements
could be made by the experts cited in the a
rticle.
Only 3 of 15
clinical trials have shown antidepressants to be
superior to a sugar pill on primary measures.
Children and parents in those 15 studies
reported no advantage of antidepressants over a
sugar pill.
Data from the
FDA and its British counterpart demonstrate that
children and adolescents taking antidepressants
are twice as likely to experience
suicide-related events. Given the
meager results and increased risk for
suicide-related events (as well as other serious
adverse events), antidepressants are not a good
choice for youth struggling with depression—a
conclusion reached after an extensive
risk/benefit analysis conducted by the American
Psychological Association’s Work Group on
Psychotropic Medication (e.g first choice).
Given that depression tends to remit over time,
and so suicidality, do these studies really
prove anything other than that any possible
increase in suicidality caused by the
medications is insufficient to overwhelm the
natural average decrease in suicidality expected
to be seen in any depressed population over
time?
To make the conclusions they are trying to make,
that the medications did not increase
suicidality or even decreased it, they would
have to have a comparison group identified as
equally depressed, not given medication, then
remeasured later. They apparently don't have
this group so they can't make that conclusion. |